Some observations on home-made composition rollers

In a post about two years ago concerning our then-newly-acquired Kelsey press I mentioned that I had made my own composition rollers for it. Someone had inquired about how I made these, and it has taken me this long to get my notes and references together. This post discusses some of the references I had to work from.

My starting point was a document I found online, La Fabbricazione dei Rulli, which appears to be chapter 25 of a book entitled IL libro e L’Arte della Stampa, published in 1914 and reprinted in 1925, by libreria Editrice Internazionale di Torino. The extracted document was prepared by Gianolio Dalmazzo, director, regia scuola tipograficae di arti e affini in Torino. The document is in Italian, and most of the information presented here (including the bibliographical information) is from a mix of Google Translate and my own knowledge of Romance languages. So the document is Roller Fabrication, chapter 25 of The Book and the Art of Printing.

This document gives several recipes for rollers:

  • Weak type:
    1. parts 1 of animal glue, 2 of fish glue, 4.5 of glucose, 0.5 of glycerin;
    2. parts 8 of glycerin, 10 of sugar, 8 of gelatin glue;
    3. 2.2kg of glue, 4.7L of molasses, 0.57L of glycerin, 600g of turpentine of Venice;
    4. 2350g of gelatin glue, 400g of water, 600g of boiled linseed oil, 250g of potash, 600g of sugar.
  • Medium type:
    1. parts 2.8 of strong glue, 0.3 of glucose, 1.3 of glycerin, 0.6 of fish glue:
    2. 2.8kg of glue, 4.5L of molasses, 0.6L of glycerin, 60g of turpentine of Venice;
    3. 1.5kg of glue, 5kg of sugar, and 6kg of glycerin;
    4. parts 35 of glue, 30 of glucose, 15 of glycerin, 20 of sugar.
  • Strong type:
    1. parts 13 of strong glue, 3 of molasses, 3 of glycerin;
    2. parts 12 of gelatin glue, 6 of glycerin, 10 of sugar.
  • The strongest type:
    1. 5kg of glue, 8L of tawny molasses, 450g natural rubber melted in turpentine oil, 60g of turpentine varnish, 360g of glycerin, 120g of vinegar;
    2. 6.5kg of strong glue, 0.6L of glycerin, 9L of dark molasses, 1kg of turpentine of Venice, 1kg of Paris white (calcium carbonate). If the beet molasses is replaced with sugar cane [cane molasses?], better rollers are had.

All these recipes include some form of gelatin, some form of sugar, and glycerine. Some of them add to this rubbery or resinous materials, probably for more strength and heat resistance. Such materials might make it difficult to melt down an re-use old rollers. I’m particularly wary of the recipe that uses boiled linseed oil, which will gradually and irreversibly harden with age as it oxidizes.

Within these recipes, there are unknown variations because the purity of the materials is uncertain. Molasses may vary as to sugar contents (both in terms of types of sugar and also other non-sugar solids), animal glues come in different grades, and glycerin is difficult to produce completely free of water. Furthermore, the recipes did not come with cooking directions.

For my purposes I wanted to limit myself to three basic ingredients: regular white cooking sugar (sucrose), woodworker’s hide glue (Lee Valley Pearl Hide Glue 56K50.05), and food grade glycerine (water content unknown). The gelatin in the glue provides the rubbery texture, the glycerine holds water to prevent the composition from drying out, but the sugar’s purpose isn’t obvious. Perhaps it makes the composition tacky. I would have to try making a mix with no sugar to see what it is like.

Sugar

According to Water vapour sorption isotherms and the caking of food powders [Mathlouthi, M., Rogé, B. Food Chemistry Volume 82, Issue 1, July 2003, Pages 61–71], below 86% relative humidity sugar (sucrose) loses all its water, although it can also remain as a metastable glass (think peanut brittle) with higher water content. Stable water content depends on crystal size but is in the general range of 200ppm, essentially zero for our purposes. Above 86%RH sugar absorbs water and dissolves in it to form a syrup.

So if the room is going to be below 86%RH, some humectant must be included to prevent the rollers from drying out. On the other hand, above 86%RH, the rollers will absorb humidity uncontrollably and will melt into a gooey syrup.

Glycerine

The Soap and Detergent Association (New York) published a booklet in 1990 entitled Glycerine: an overview. One thing this clears up is that glycerin, glycerine, and glycerol are various names used inconsistently and often interchangeably for essentially the same compound, although in some circles, the choice of name depends on water content. I suppose “clears up” isn’t such a good choice of words, but this means it is not necessary to fret over the distinction.

Glycerine left in the open will absorb water from the air depending on the relative humidity. The following values were taken from a graph in this booklet (the glycerine and water percentages are by weight):

%RH % glycerine % water water/glycerine
20% 97 3 0.03
30% 93 7 0.08
40% 89 11 0.12
50% 84 16 0.19
60% 76 24 0.32
70% 67 33 0.49

The last column is significant because it gives some hint as to how much swelling or shrinkage a roller can undergo between a heated room in the winter (20-30%RH) and summer conditions (60-70%RH). This also shows how it is important that the rollers be cast with the correct water content so they don’t end up the wrong size once they have reached an equilibrium with the current room air.

Gelatin

Gelatin is a family of proteins extracted from the collagen in animal bones, skin, and connective tissue by boiling then in water. It has the property that above a specific temperature, it dissolves in water to form a liquid (called the sol phase), and below that temperature, the sol gradually sets into a rubbery solid, the gel phase. The transition temperature depends on how the gelatin is produced but is typically a few degrees below body temperature so gelatin-based foods dissolve in the mouth. The water concentration only affects the strength of the gel (both in terms of elasticity and also rupture strength), not the transition temperature.

Grades of gelatin are rated for stiffness using the Bloom test, measuring the elasticity of a 6.67% gelatin solution stabilized at 10°C. The hide glue I use is rated at 150g Bloom strength, but there is another grade rated at 260g which I would expect would make much stiffer rollers.

When the composition is cooked, the gelatine gradually degrades, which reduces its strength and probably its transition temperature as well.

Pigments and Fillers

When made with pure gelatin and white sugar, the rollers should end up translucent white. If molasses and/or hide glue are used, the result will be a shade of brown. Sometimes powders are added to the composition (as the Paris White in one of the quoted recipes). These are chemically inert but the interfere with the elastic deformation of the composition so they make the roller harder without increasing its tear strength. They also make the roller opaque, so composition that would have been dark translucent brown might instead have a caramel colour. A roller made with pure gelatin and white sugar could have almost any colour one wants. Of course, the colour of the roller itself it pretty much immaterial, other that having a good contrast with the ink makes it easier to clean then thoroughly.

To use such pigments, the main difficulty would be to disperse them in the molten composition without trapping any air. Fine pigment particles have a strong tendency to form small clumps around microscopic air bubbles, and such bubbles would ultimately lead to a porous hard-to-clean surface on the rollers. The pigments are formed into a paste with one of the liquid ingredients (probably the glycerine) so no additional water is added to the recipe. The clumps and bubbles can be worked out by mulling the pigment paste or using an ink grinder, or it might be possible to extract them by applying a vacuum to the paste.

Preservatives

The composition is so low on water content (and what water is present is bound to other ingredients) that decay of the composition is unlikely. A moistened surface, say, due to bringing a cold roller into a damp room, might encourage growth of mould on the surface. The best way to avoid this is to keep the rollers dry so the mould doesn’t have a chance to establish itself in the first place. However, copper compounds have fungicidal properties, so a small amount of copper sulphate can be added for protection. This will add a bit of blue to the roller colour, so ones that would be brown tend to become closer to black instead.

The biggest problem is that animals, especially rodents like mice and rats, and likely including ants as well, just love this stuff. Sugar, gelatin, and something else that is sweet-tasting (glycerin)? What more could they want! I don’t know how the critters feel about copper sulphate. Poison ant bait contains boric acid which the ants bring back to the colony, killing them all, and poison rodent bait contains anticoagulants (including Coumadin) causing them to bleed to death. I would not recommend trying to add either to your composition.

Putting it all together

In order to follow a recipe for composition rollers, you need detailed descriptions of the ingredients. Some variables, like water content of glycerine and molasses, can be compensated for by adjusting cooking time. On the other hand, variations in the impurities between different varieties of molasses or hide glue becomes a source of unpredictability.

Ideally you want the ingredients to start with the correct water content since extended cooking degrades the gelatin. As well, casting the rollers with too much water and letting them acclimatize later results in rollers that are too small and with their surface under tension making them vulnerable to splits and tears.

Composition rollers require care: they have to be kept below 86%RH and also below the gel transition temperature of the gelatin, or they will melt. They also have to be used in the range of humidity they were designed for; otherwise they will be the wrong size and hardness. In extreme cases a roller can tear because it is fragile from softness, or it can crack because the shrinkage around its core has puts it under a lot of tension.

Questions to answer

One question already raised is: what does the sugar do? To test this I would make test batches with widely varied sugar content to see how they differ. My expectation is that the surface texture will be affected.

How does the stable water content vary with changes to the ratio of the three major ingredients? Again, I can try test batches poured out onto foil and weighed regularly over a few days to see how much humidity they ultimately absorb. The main uncertainty here is the water content of the glycerine.

How does the hardness vary with ingredient ratio changes? For this test I would have to find myself a Shore A Durometer for measuring the resilience of the composition.

Introductory Papermaking Workshop in February

We’ve had some people asking us about our Introductory Papermaking Workshop this February. They’re flexible about when they can be here, but we will probably hold it on a Saturday. If you might be interested in this workshop, please get in touch with us soon with your date preferences so we can pick a date get a big group together!

An enjoyable marbling workshop

After seeming like we might have up to six people attending yesterday’s marbling workshop, we actually ended up with only two.

However, we all had a good time, even Lily did some marbling.

Mike running a nonpareil comb through.

Mike running a nonpareil comb through.

One of Staci's designs, ready to print

One of Staci’s designs, ready to print

Lily getting ready to comb her tray.

Lily getting ready to comb her tray.

She still needs some practice laying down her paper.

She still needs some practice laying down her paper.

The trays we were using are 9×12 inch cake pans from a local restaurant supplier. We were using carrageenan size and craft acrylic paints on a variety of papers.

Marbling Workshop, Saturday January 10th 2015

We will be holding an introductory workshop on western marbling using acrylic paints from 9am-4pm on Saturday, January 10th 2015. The fee for this workshop is $65 plus HST. If you would like to attend, please don’t hesitate to contact us to reserve your spot.

Crazy Sharp!

This morning I was setting up some paper to cut on our guillotine. I was positioning the stack of paper under the clamp when I noticed that the edge of the clamp didn’t feel “right” against my knuckle. That’s when I realized that the blade had parked a bit low after the last use, and my knuckle was resting against the knife rather than the clamp!

There seemed to be no injury so my thought at the time was that the knife must be really dull. It was only a few minutes later when I noticed my hand was bleeding a bit that I realized that the knife wasn’t dull, it was in fact so sharp that it had cut me without my even feeling it!

20141230Sharp Knife EffectsIt was indeed a very minor injury, but still enough to remind me how crazy sharp the guillotine knife really is.

An interesting book about pulp & paper science

After a recommendation on the Papermaking Yahoo Group a few months ago, I purchased a copy of Pulp Technology and Treatment for Paper by James d’A. Clark, published in 1978 by Miller Freeman Publications, San Fransisco, California. I purchased my copy through ABE Books, having found a copy there for a not too unreasonable price.

This book takes a scientific approach to pulp processing and paper, to try to provide a more reliable view of the process than many of the empirical methods that had been developed since wood pulp was first used in the mid 1800’s. Some of the author’s theses directly contradict lore that has been passed down in the industry for decades.

There are five major sections. The first discusses the chemistry and physics of wood fibres, pulp, and paper. Section 2 describes processing steps applied to pulp and fundamental tests that are applied to the pulp and paper. More in-depth tests of the pulp and fibres are described in section 3, and the last two sections describe process control and pulp constituents, and practical ways of managing pulp and paper testing in a mill.

The book is primarily concerned with machine-made paper produced from wood pulp. Hand-formed sheets are hardly mentioned, so the reader must infer for themselves how much various principles apply. Other fibre sources typically used in hand papermaking are mentioned to contrast their properties with those of wood fibres. In most such materials, the cellulose molecules are close to parallel to the length of the fibres, whereas the cellulose in wood fibres forms relatively steep spirals around the fibre and also reverses angle several times through the thickness of the fibre.

Some of the author’s claims that contradict conventional wisdom include:

  • Beating causes fibre shortening, external fibrillation, and internal fibrillation, but not fibre “swelling” in the proper sense of the word. A side effect of the first two is the generation of “fines” (fibres too small to be caught by the screen in the paper machine) and “chop” (fibrous material so short and stumpy that it looses its fibrous character).
  • Bonding in paper is almost entirely due to fibrils and microfibrils and the innumerable contact points they form with other fibres, and not due to the presence of hemicellulose (chemicals that are close to cellulose, but not close enough to be included in the crystalline structure that cellulose forms within the fibres). Materials such as hemicellulose do, however, have a secondary effect in that they prevent fibrils loosened by beating from bonding back to their primary fibre, so they remain available for bonding to other fibres in the paper. At several places, the descriptions of ideal fibration made me think of fractals, where the splitting of the fibres would be taken all the way down to having individual cellulose molecules swaying in the water.
  • The action of the laboratory beater (which the author often calls a “toy beater”) is not a good indicator of how the pulp will behave in a production environment. Beaters like the Valley Beater recirculate the pulp and so beat most of the fibres to the same degree. In production, the beating is done by refiners rather than Hollander beaters, and these use a single pass which produces a wider range from untouched fibres to heavily beaten ones.
  • The freeness test (Canadian Standard or Schopper-Riegler) is pretty much meaningless, as all it really measures is fines content. It is not even a good indicator of drainage speed on the paper machine because of the difference in sheet weight, and also the discrepancy between the slow steady drainage in the freeness tester as compared with the somewhat turbulent drainage on the machine. Multiple freeness test results on the same pulp are highly inconsistent, and are not a good predictor of important properties of finished paper. A better test of beating progress is to measure the density of handsheets formed in the standard sheetformer that have been lightly pressed and heat dried.

I found that the information was generally presented very clearly. Section 1 in particular gave a thorough description of the behaviour of pulp fibres starting all the way from the formation of the chemical bonds that hold the cellulose molecules together.

Due to my having only a passing familiarity with some of the various pulp, fibre, and paper tests, and also to not knowing whether a particular test result was better or worse if numerically larger, I encountered some confusion in later parts of the book. A reader might benefit from maintaining a cheat sheet of tests as they are described to avoid such problems.

All in all, this book is a valuable addition to the technical paper making section of our library.

A Musical Connection Between Letterpress and Christmas

Many people already know that music for the familiar Christmas carol Hark! the Herald Angels Sing is credited to Felix Mendelssohn.

Through a series of messages on the LETPRESS mailing list, I found out just recently that the original Mendelssohn work was written to celebrate the 400th anniversary of Johannes Gutenberg’s development of a workable system of printing with moveable type.

This work was played June 24th 1840 in the marketplace in Leipzig as part of a Gutenberg festival, and consisted of four parts, the second of which became the Chritsmas carol. The music was written for four male singers and two small brass orchestras, with the footnote (courtesy of Google Translate):

The second small orchestra must be placed at a great distance from the first to make it the same as an echo replies

Parts of the score have a call-and-response structure and Mendelssohn added this note to ensure the responses would sound distant. Clearly this was designed for the open-air venue in which it was first performed!

In adapting the music in 1855 to hymn lyrics by Charles Wesley, William Hayman Cummings took the main melody from the second part, omitting the central bridge, producing the carol as we now know it.

A MIDI sequencing of the original second part can be heard on YouTube, and there is more information on this music on Wikipedia.

 

 

A Minecraft black hole

Lily has taken a liking to playing Minecraft, and I’ve been sucked into it as well. We have 6 computers networked together here at our home and store, so it made sense to set up a network server so we could play the game anywhere and have the same “world” to play in.

Just playing the game can be quite a time suck, but so was setting up the server. Although the game itself is quite well documented, some of the issues relating to setting up the server have poor or incorrect advice. This is often the result of formulaic answers being passed from one person to another with no understanding of how they work.

Fundamentally, Minecraft is a Java program, so when it is running on MS Windows, it shows in the task listings as java.exe or javaw.exe. The server is, however, available as either a Java program or as a native Windows executable. It turns out that the latter just invokes Java with the proper arguments to extract the Java code from the executable file itself.

When the server is first run, it writes several files to contain options, settings, and its world data. This is one place where the documentation I found was wrong. It claimed that on most systems, this information was written to the current directory, but that on Windows, it was written to the directory that contained the .exe file. This is incorrect. Although Windows gives this appearance, it is actually because when you run a .exe file from Window Explorer, the process’s current directory is set to the location of the .exe file. Thus, the program is indeed writing to its current directory (as on most other systems), but that current directory does not necessarily match the one that the program was run from. As a result you can use Shortcut files or batch script files to keep the installation location of the server code clean and store the data elsewhere. On my system (which is Windows 7) I installed the server program at Program Files (x86)\Mojang\Server alongside the client Minecraft.exe file, and the data in ProgramData\Local\Minecraft_Server.

I wanted this to run as a true server, which would be available anytime the computer was up, so I used NSSM to run the server as a proper Windows Service which you can start and stop using the Service Management console. This had the built-in ability to set the process current directory as mentioned above, and the service appears as an instance of javaw.exe running.

Next came the problem of connecting to this server from another computer. Windows Firewall to the (not) rescue. WF is itself has rather limited rules capability: You can set a default (to accept or reject) for network connections not covered by a specific rule, and the specific rules can select by IP address, port, traffic type (UDP or TCP), user, and program to decide whether to accept or reject network traffic. There is a different rule set for outbound and inbound traffic, with the former typically set to allow pretty much anything through.

It seems that when there is no specific rule for new traffic and the default rule rejects it, a “helpful” window appears on the screen asking whether the traffic should be permitted or rejected. This window would be truly helpful if it specified all the connection information (port, IP address, etc) and allowed the rule it makes to be tailored to the need. But instead, it always results in either an “allow all” or “deny all” rule for the particular program.

Problems come in when the program is a general language interpreter like Java, because this means the program identity (if any) in a rule is somewhat useless: it cannot distinguish javaw.exe running Minecraft from javaw.exe running some other (perhaps hostile) software.

You can’t make a rule to allow the Minecraft server to accept connections on port 25565 but deny all other traffic to java.exe because there is only one level of rule override. That override level cannot be used because non-Minecraft traffic will cause the “helper” will leap in and create another blanket accept or reject rule. The latter, being non-specific, would include Minecraft traffic and, were it a Reject rule, would override any Allow rule, even one with more specific criteria.

As a result of this “helper” our various computers already had an assortment of allow-all, deny-all, or no rule at all (and thus default deny) for javaw.exe.

The firewall logging also was no help. It appears that when a program accepting incoming traffic is blocked by the firewall, this happens when it first tries to accept the connections. The program is put in a sort of quarantine, and any later incoming connection attempts are treated as if no one were listening for them. This in turn means they do not appear in the firewall log as denied packets; they are just packets sent to a port no one is listening on. The quarantining of the program is not logged either. The net effect is that there is nothing in the log to explain why the incoming packets aren’t working.

This is one place where repeating of rote information flooded out any attempt I made to find help using Google. Most people who set up a server want to do this so other users (their friends, typically) can connect to their server and play with them. Trying to do this requires a whole other set of fiddling to arrange that traffic coming from the Internet at large is directed to the correct computer within their local network, none of which has anything to do with Windows Firewall.

So for now, my server has a specific rule allowing incoming TCP connections on port 25565 to the javaw.exe program (I could also make it user-specific to the user that the server is running as). Next time I try running some other Java program that wants network access, the “helper” will leap in and, depending on how I answer, put in a rule allowing any Java program to have any network traffic, or denying all such (and overriding my specific rule).

One solution for me to try is to use a feature of the file system to make a hard link to the javaw.exe file called, say, JavaForMinecraft.exe. If the server run using this file name instead of java.exe shows the alternate file name on its process, I could make a specific rule that uses this alternative program name, and rules generated by the “helper” for javaw.exe would not interfere.

Then there is a whirlpool of confusion swirling around Mojang accounts, Minecraft accounts, Windows accounts, Minecraft Profiles, and Worlds, but that might be the subject of another article.

Tagged with:

More bookcloth remnants

My trip to the Niagara area last month included a stop to get more assorted pieces of bookcloth. We finally got the cloth stored in our rack and have some samples for making an updated sample sheet.

IMG_7560Those two that look black (second from left and near centre) are both actually very dark blue. Most are a lightweight linen texture, but a couple have a heavier smooth finish. We have about 3m of each of these, but some of them were the end of the roll and can be as short as ½m.

Marbling from Heart & Hand

It has been a while since Heart & Hand, but I finally took pictures of all the marbling we made that day.

The colour balance is a bit off on this photo. I fixed it for the rest.

The colour balance is a bit off on this photo. I fixed it for the rest.

IMG_7564

A bit of an experimental design on the upper left, and a big bubble flaw lower left.

Lily did the lower two sheets in this photo.

Lily did the lower two sheets in this photo.

IMG_7566

A fiery feather design upper left along with bouquet, get-gel, and stone patterns

IMG_7567

Four bouquet patterns in greens and yellows, and a bit of red in one.

IMG_7568

Another stone pattern and one more green-yellow bouquet.

We had one more sheet that Lily made with the help of one of the show visitors, but that sheet was purchased on the spot by one of the other exhibitors (and delivered later, once dry). All these 18×24″ sheets have been added to our stock of marbled paper for sale.

Top